[sinkspur]

You really don't think that 80 years of talking animal cartoons had anything to do with the emergence of this whacko animal rights crap? With the emergence of a movement that values animals over people?

The animal rights' movement is miniscule and fringe. In any case, anything that helps stem the tide of animal cruelty is, to me, a good thing.

But, I'm not at all surprised that you see something nefarious behind Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck.

[the lone haranguer]

Thank you sinkspur, I agree. Animal cruelty is a problem and does require a lobby from somewhere. It's unfortunate, though, that it has to come from these groups.

As far as the conspiracy of the cartoonists' unions and the movie people, I'm certain that its impact on the children is much greater than that of a parent who actually takes time and puts forth the effort to be a parent. (I hope my sarcasm is noted.)

[dsc]

"But, I'm not at all surprised that you see something nefarious behind Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck."

And I'm not surprised to see you dishonestly misrepresenting my position...again...and again, and again.

Not surprised at all. As a matter of fact, if someone had asked me, "Who on FR is most likely to try and twist an assertion of unintended effects into a conspiracy theory," your handle would have been the first that leapt to mind.

Still, the birthday I've had today just wouldn't have been complete without being slimed by you. I've been dealing since I got up with unreason, lack of consideration, dishonesty, two-faced hypocrisy, racism, rudeness, and garden-variety stupidity.

You're just the maraschino on top.

[Grey Ghost II]

The animal rights' movement is miniscule and fringe. In any case, anything that helps stem the tide of animal cruelty is, to me, a good thing.

Like torching SUV dealerships?