Mr. Drolesky, as usual, gets it wrong concerning Fr. Schillebeeckx. In 1979 Fr. S. was brought to the Vatican to explain some of his views. The Vatican ruled that some of his views were " at variance with the teaching of the Church." Mr. Drolesky makes it out to seem as though Fr. S. has spent his career unmolested and ignored by the Church. Not so.
If what you say was true--what was he doing as an "expert" at the Council?
So what happened to Schillebeeckx? Were his books censured and put on the Index of Forbidden books? Was he sent off to a monastery to work on cleansing his soul? Or was he burned at the stake in order to prevent the spread of his ideas that were at variance with Church teaching?
It must have been a damning condemnation.
St.Chuck, as usual, gets it wrong concerning the spelling of Mr. Droleskey's name.
Got your attention? Excuse me, but where do you come up with what Mr. Droleskey's errors are on this topic? Do you have a list of how many times he "gets it wrong?" Or are you somehow sympathetic to the other guy's agenda, the guy who denies dogma and gets away with it?