Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: St.Chuck
The Michaelangelo's of the rennaisance were studying the art of Rome and Greece,and the ideas of Plato, not the Church. Baroque artists represented the exorbitant wealth and excess of the nation state and the monarchy, not the Church.

What an asinine and terribly unlearned statement. As if all of our greatest artists were of a monolithic, uninspired and secular mind.

Would you mind explaining how the philosophy of Plato has anything whatsoever do with with the works of Rembrandt?

35 posted on 03/05/2005 9:39:31 PM PST by AAABEST (Kyrie eleison - Christe eleison †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: AAABEST
What an asinine and terribly unlearned statement.

You certainly have a rude way of joining a conversation, but I appreciate your interest anyway.

As if all of our greatest artists were of a monolithic, uninspired and secular mind.

Didn't imply that at all. I'm just saying that the great rennaisance artists were neo-classicists and Platonists. The Church didn't teach them how to paint. It merely dictated what to paint-to an extent-for every religious theme there was also a "School of Athens" or "Primavera".

Would you mind explaining how the philosophy of Plato has anything whatsoever do with with the works of Rembrandt?

I never brought up Rembrandt, can't say I'm too familiar with him, but I think it highly unlikely that the Church had anything to do with inspiring his most common subject----himself.

44 posted on 03/05/2005 10:44:46 PM PST by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson