Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

I'm not sure what to make of this.
1 posted on 03/03/2005 1:56:36 PM PST by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: old and tired

Seems pretty clear - the Vatican is concerned about their liability.


2 posted on 03/03/2005 1:58:47 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: old and tired

The Vatican has not been responsive to a flock demanding accountability and reform. Their solution was to quietly shuffle molestors into someone else's backyard.

But now that Mammon is threatened, they're all ears.

I hop Condi told them to go jump in a lake.


5 posted on 03/03/2005 2:09:16 PM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: old and tired

I found this from the time the suit was filed. McMurry states what he "believes" is true regarding the number of victims. Apparently the Vatican knew all the details. Or, at least, should bear the financial responsibility.

I wonder how soon he will propose a settlement conference? I wonder if he has filed his motions for the injunctions?


Louisville Courier-Journal

Louisville attorney sues the Vatican

By Peter Smith and Andrew Wolfson, The Courier-Journal


Lawsuit over sex abuse by priests faces hurdles


June 6, 2004 -- A Louisville attorney filed a federal lawsuit against the Vatican yesterday, accusing leaders of the Roman Catholic Church of orchestrating a cover-up of priests who allegedly molested thousands of American children.

William McMurry -- who last year represented 243 victims in reaching a $25.7 million settlement with the Archdiocese of Louisville -- filed yesterday's suit on behalf of three men alleging abuse as far back as 1928 in the Louisville area.

McMurry is seeking to have the lawsuit certified as a class-action case, saying in the suit that he believes there are "at least several thousand" victims nationwide.

"This lawsuit is designed to lay the responsibility for all childhood sexual abuse committed by priests in America at the feet of the responsible party, and that's the Vatican," McMurry said in an interview with The Courier-Journal.

Although dioceses in Louisville and elsewhere have paid settlements, he said the "financial responsibility should be shared, if not borne entirely, by the Vatican."

A receptionist at the Vatican embassy in Washington referred questions to the Vatican's press office in Rome, which closed before the suit was filed yesterday morning.

Mark Chopko, general counsel for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, called McMurry's suit a "long shot" that likely will be dismissed. Chopko also questioned McMurry's decision to sue on behalf of plaintiffs who already settled with dioceses. "They have already had their day in court."

In the suit -- filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky -- McMurry is asking for unspecified monetary damages from the Vatican. He also is requesting injunctions requiring the Vatican to "cease its violations of the internationally recognized human rights of children" and "to report all allegations of childhood sexual abuse" in the United States.

And he is asking a federal judge to supervise the Vatican's conduct for 10 years. The suit was assigned to Judge John G. Heyburn II.

Legal scholars say McMurry will face towering obstacles in what they say is the first class-action suit against the Vatican regarding sexual abuse, and the first sexual-abuse lawsuit to name the Vatican as the sole defendant.

Other lawyers have named the Vatican as a co-defendant with dioceses and religious orders in sexual-abuse lawsuits. Those cases either have been dismissed or are pending.

Even if a court finds that McMurry's clients have a legal standing to sue, it will be hard to prove that the Vatican knew about abuse and failed to act on it, said Boston lawyer Roderick MacLeish Jr., who has represented more than 400 plaintiffs in priest-abuse cases.

"I have reviewed thousands of pages of documents surrendered by the Archdiocese of Boston but haven't seen a scintilla of evidence showing the Vatican knew what was going on," he said.

(Excerpt)


8 posted on 03/03/2005 3:43:31 PM PST by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: old and tired
First of all, congrats on posting this article 120 seconds before I tried to do so!

Here is my response to the article:
The homosexual priest abuse scandal doesn't stop at the archdiocese of Boston, or LA, or Louisville, or the hundreds of other parishes and diocesan chancery offices. The scandal also goes to Rome where many of these abuses where known, yet Bishops remained in place to enable the perpetrators to move from parish to parish without penalty -- except for the sins, deceptions, lies, and victims left everywhere. And several Bishops are also directly implicated in many of these acts. Question: Where do they report? Times up. Rome.
Let all the TRUTH come out with these lawsuits. Let the chips fall where they may. The healing won't begin until every shred of evidence is out in the open. We are a long way from the painful TRUTH and its path all the way to and through Rome during this post Vatican II era.

10 posted on 03/03/2005 4:26:45 PM PST by vox_freedom (Fear no evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: old and tired

Let the chips fall where they may.


11 posted on 03/03/2005 11:10:39 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: old and tired

Sodano is a communist and ultra liberal, Condi should just kick him with her boots.


13 posted on 03/04/2005 9:31:09 AM PST by Pio (There was no Salvation outside the Roman Catholic Church)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson