[solitas]

I do NOT presume him to be a molester - they ARE a very small percentage of the total. My post asked whether or not he had gone on the record saying he wasn't (or merely assuming a "please don't ask and I won't have to tell"-attitude). I stated no scandalous accusation, resent your use of 'bigot', and you can go shove your 'aha! catholic-bashing!' attitude up your bunghole.

I _can_ see a connnection, and i have heard of stories of BOTH boys AND girls being mishandled by priests. THIS is far more damaging to THEM than married queers that they'll probably never hear about or encounter. AND. IT. IS. A. CRIME.

And WHY are "all Catholics everywhere surrender[ing] their democratic freedom because of the actions of a few homosexual perverts"? That one needs an explanation.

[dangus]

Then you better learn how to write better! You wrote this:

"What brave words has Mister Henry gone on record with concerning himself and some of his fellow employees and their apparent hobbies of diddling little kids and playing "hide the perpetrator"

By adding the words "himself and" you make the word "their" appear to include Bishop Henry among those whose hobbies include "diddling little kids."

Of course, you also presume that Bishop Henry has tolerated such behavior, if it does exist, simply because he is Catholic.

For the record, the huge majority of the so-called "pedophilia" cases are not pedophilia at all, but ephibophelia. IOW, Gay men trying to sodomizing other gay men, probably targeting post-pubescent teenagers largely because of their immunological "cleanliness" and their susceptibility.

And yes, this is mostly a men-and-boys issue.

>>And WHY are "all Catholics everywhere surrender[ing] their democratic freedom because of the actions of a few homosexual perverts"? That one needs an explanation. <<

You attacked and slandered the bishop for raising his voice about a political issue simply because he was Catholic.