Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl; marron; cornelis; PatrickHenry; RightWhale; ckilmer; bvw; psipsistar; ...
Important superscript omitted. Correction to text, from

"... we can draw quantitative consequences with regard to the static and dynamic information content of DNA. We estimated that the information necessary to govern the >105 chemical reactions sec–1 cell–1 in the 6*1013 human cells requires >1019 bits sec–1 that cannot be supplied from the static sequential information content of DNA ~109 bits for more than 10–10 sec."

to

"... we can draw quantitative consequences with regard to the static and dynamic information content of DNA. We estimated that the information necessary to govern the >105 chemical reactions sec–1 cell–1 in the 6*1013 human cells requires >1019 bits sec–1 that cannot be supplied from the static sequential information content of DNA ~109 bits for more than 10–10 sec."

So sorry! -- bb.

4 posted on 02/27/2005 1:13:02 PM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop

Per Bruce Lipton, DNA does not control cell processing, but it has a different function and normally remains dormant.


6 posted on 02/27/2005 1:17:34 PM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop
It's no more meaningful after the revision.

The argument would hold water if the metabolism of each individual cell were entirely independent. On the contrary; the vast majority of metabolic steps are regulated in the same way in all cells.

The tradition of gross misuse of probability theory in the name of religion lives on.

44 posted on 02/28/2005 9:42:01 AM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson