I thought Burke has said that all the assets would be used to serve St. Stanislaus parish.
If it was Burke's intention to sell the property, then he was lying through his teeth.
Probably not with all the rebuilding, but that was the original assumption by just about everybody. At least that was a motivation put forth early on. About a year ago from people who don't care for the Archbishop.
The problem was that Burke wanted to control who was on the Board, and once that happened, prior arrangements could be changed by the reconstituted Board. That is why the proposal of Burke was rejected out of hand. I still don't get the canon law being determinative, unless it was incorporated into the bylaws of the entity which owned the Church, but I guess the issue in your view will soon be moot in any event.