Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

Thank you! We needed to hear this.


3 posted on 02/15/2005 4:04:37 PM PST by amdgmary (Please visit www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: NYer; Land of the Irish; ultima ratio; amdgmary; Canticle_of_Deborah; sinkspur; thor76; ...
Enough said!

Not really.

One has to wonder why Zenit and the Vatican have spent as much or more time nervously telling us the entire third secret has been revealed and that Russia was really consecrated (yet everyone just happened to miss it) than they have mourning Sister Lucia.

I read the what we've been told is the third secret. What I don't understand is why on God's earth would what they are telling us is the "third secret" be kept under wraps for so long?

IOW, in order for Rome to keep the third from being revealed for so long it must have been something so controversal or shocking that it just couldn't be released (in their view). There was nothing I read in their version of the "third secret" that would cause such a reaction. There is nothing scandalous, controversial or horrifying in it. It's for the most part innocuous.

After all according to our Church, our Lady was present at Fatima. She told the Lucia that it was to be released in 1960, Rome refused.

Would someone please point out to me what it is in the "third secret" presented to us that would cause it to be kept hidden for decades?

It just doesn't make any sense at all.

25 posted on 02/15/2005 6:22:41 PM PST by AAABEST (Kyrie eleison - Christe eleison †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson