Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts

Look at the circumscription of Ratzinger's statement and you'll find the answer.

Of course, the restrictions will be widely ignored.


107 posted on 02/20/2005 5:24:36 AM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ninenot

Frankly, I think this is another Abp. Flynn-type situtation, and the Swiss bishops are not relating accurately what was told them, whether that be for reasons of misinterpretation or for other reasons.

The conditions supposedly laid down are nonsensical. Under what "emergency" would a priest be available to offer Mass, but would be unable to give the homily? There are none. This is only another case of dissenters trying to get women in the pulpit.


109 posted on 02/20/2005 6:32:13 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: ninenot; narses; ultima ratio
BTW, I did a followup on my blog on this, with some info from another story on it from Kath.net. Here's the Kath.net story:

http://www.kath.net/detail.php?id=9719

One of the funniest parts is this:

Suffragan bishop Paul Vollmar of Zurich told in a radio interview, that during a meeting on liturgical aspects, his German and Austrian colleagues have rebuked the idea to allow homilies by lay people: "Suddenly all of them approached me and said: You Swiss are really the pestilence in Europe."

110 posted on 02/20/2005 6:37:29 AM PST by B Knotts (http://blog.slappy.org <- my Catholic blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson