What is inflammatory about this particular article?
We had someone come on and give a testimony of how Sproul's writing helped bring him to Christ.
We had stuartcr on asking things even though he doesn't believe a word of it.
And then we have PM saying that Sproul rejects the Gospel and actually writes against it.
Who is being inflammatory?
If asking questions is inflammatory, then I am definitely guilty.
I don't understand either. Why is the mere posting of this article "inflammatory"?