Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vox_freedom
sense of sacred simplicity

The words are Hand's, I suppose implying his personal idea of what Sacrosanctum Concilium meant by
'The rites should be distinguished by a noble simplicity. They should be short, clear, and free from useless repetitions. They should be within the peoples' powers of comprehension, and normally should not require much explanation.'
His statement isn't authoritative, particularly since it's a misstatement of the Council's words and I would appreciate someone directing me to what was meant by the council's words.

My impression is that it has primarily meant jettisoning things which were added to the Mass and, speaking honestly, dumbing down. The latter ('normally should not require much explanation') means not a deeper understanding, rather a more superficial exposure.

I have to be cautious with such thinking, because as has been pointed out by folks who understand me, I have an inclination to snobbishness.
6 posted on 01/24/2005 9:03:51 PM PST by Mike Fieschko (A thunder of jets in an open sky ... a streak of grey ... and a cheerful 'Hi!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Mike Fieschko
Snobbishness can sometimes be masked by a noble simplicity. :-) Also, IMO Hand's writings are often without "authority." I will see what can be found on the definition issue.
7 posted on 01/25/2005 7:17:48 AM PST by vox_freedom (Fear no evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson