Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attorney: Bernardin lied, visited crime scene/ Why did Wisconsin priest commit suicide?
renewamerica.us ^ | January 2, 2005 | Matt C. Abbott

Posted on 01/03/2005 8:53:58 AM PST by St. Johann Tetzel

Attorney: Bernardin lied, visited crime scene



Matt C. Abbott

Matt C. Abbott
January 2, 2005


The late Joseph Cardinal Bernardin was a controversial figure. Beloved by some and scorned by others, the cardinal for many years exercised immense influence in the Catholic Church in the U.S. He died of pancreatic cancer in 1996.

In 1993, Bernardin was accused of sexual abuse by a former seminarian, Steven Cook, who died of AIDS not long after "recanting" his allegation, saying his memories were "unreliable." Jason Berry and Gerald Renner devote a segment to the Bernardin-Cook matter in their 2004 book "Vows of Silence: The Abuse of Power in the Papacy of John Paul II." Bernardin was quoted at a press conference as saying:

"'I've been a priest for forty-two years...and a bishop for twenty-eight years...And you know, it's inevitable that anyone who is in a public position and who takes stands that are controversial is vulnerable. But it's interesting, only three accusations have been made against me, all within the current year — (p. 115)

"'What were the other two?' a journalist cut it.

"'One was from a lady outside the state trying to implicate me in a satanic rite that allegedly took place thirty-five, thirty-six years ago. The other allegation was from a young man in another state who accused me and several others of engaging in some kind of orgy with him. And those...are totally false.'" (p. 116)

The "satanic rite" allegation to which Bernardin was referring had been made by a woman who reportedly is married to an FBI agent. The following 2002 article contains more detailed information on the allegation:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28294

The WorldNetDaily article also mentions that Bernardin visited the crime scene of Francis Pellegrini, a choir director and professor who was found stabbed to death on May 30, 1984 in his apartment on Chicago's South side. Attorney Sheila Parkhill, who for the past two years has been investigating the still-unsolved murder and its probable connection to a pedophile ring known as The Boys' Club, says this of Bernardin's denials: "He lied, pure and simple."

Parkhill also confirms Bernardin did indeed visit the Pellegrini crime scene, and is asking anyone with information on The Boys' Club or the murder to contact her at stparkhill@yahoo.com.


Matt C. Abbott is the former executive director of the Illinois Right to Life Committee and the former director of public affairs for the Chicago-based Pro-Life Action League. He is a Catholic journalist and commentator. He can be reached at mattcabbott@hotmail.com.

© Copyright 2005 by Matt C. Abbott
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/abbott/050102



The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.



TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: abusivepriests; bernardin
Why did Wisconsin priest commit suicide?



Matt C. Abbott

Matt C. Abbott
December 26, 2004


In the 1987 feature film The Rosary Murders, Father Bob Koesler (played by Donald Sutherland) hears the confession of a man who is killing priests and nuns of Detroit, Mich. The killer doesn't reveal his identity to Koesler, but does give him a clue as to why he is committing the murders. Koesler then begins his own clandestine investigation. Of course, the police get on his case once it becomes obvious he knows something about the killer, but, being bound by the seal of confession, cannot reveal anything to help their investigation.

This key aspect to the film's storyline came to mind after reading about the recent real-life case of Father Ryan Erickson, a Catholic priest who reportedly committed suicide after being interviewed by police about an unsolved double homicide that occurred in Hudson, Wis. in 2002.

According to a Dec. 23 Associated Press story, "Hudson detectives recently interviewed Erickson about the shooting deaths of Dan O'Connell, 39, and James Ellison, 22, at the O'Connell Family Funeral Home Feb. 5, 2002. O'Connell was the director and Ellison an intern at the funeral home. Hudson police issued a statement saying detectives had interviewed Erickson in the case, as they have interviewed others during the probe, but they weren't able to speak to him again after he got an attorney through the state public defender's office." (See: http://www.duluthsuperior.com/.../news/politics/10488758.htm.)

The way I see it, there are three plausible theories as to why Erickson hanged himself. One, he was somehow involved in the murders, and simply couldn't face his crime and grave sin. Two, he knew who committed the murders, but could say nothing to the police because the killer(s) confessed to him. The police figured such might be the case, and questioned him accordingly. Father Erickson couldn't deal with the stress of knowing the perpetrator(s) and keeping it a secret. Three, his suicide had absolutely nothing to do with said situation.

I'm inclined to think it is theory one or two. Yes, it is possible Erickson killed himself for some other reason no one knows about, but I find that an unlikely scenario.

In the film, the fictional Father Koesler is bothered tremendously by the fact that he cannot reveal any information he learned in the confessional. The Catholic Church is clear on this matter: "Given the delicacy and greatness of this ministry and the respect due to persons, the Church declares that every priest who hears confessions is bound under very severe penalties to keep absolute secrecy regarding the sins that his penitents have confessed to him. He can make no use of knowledge that confession gives him about penitents' lives. This secret, which admits of no exceptions, is called the 'sacramental seal,' because what the penitent has made known to the priest remains 'sealed' by the sacrament" (no. 1467).

So what could a priest reveal that wouldn't constitute a violation of the seal? Basically nothing. According to Father William Saunders, pastor of Our Lady of Hope Parish in Potomac Falls and a professor of catechetics and theology at Notre Dame Graduate School in Alexandria, Va., a priest "cannot break the seal to save his own life, to protect his good name, to refute a false accusation, to save the life of another, to aid the course of justice (like reporting a crime), or to avert a public calamity. He cannot be compelled by law to disclose a person's confession or be bound by any oath he takes, e.g. as a witness in a court trial. A priest cannot reveal the contents of a confession either directly, by repeating the substance of what has been said, or indirectly, by some sign, suggestion, or action." (See: http://www.catholicherald.com/saunders/99ws/ws991118.htm.)

Perhaps this is what ate away at Erickson. We may never know.

In the film, the priest almost violates the seal, but is given a providential "out" that allows the story to come to a satisfactory, if melancholy, conclusion. Sadly, that didn't happen in real life. For some reason, Erickson succumbed to despair.

May God have mercy on his soul.


Matt C. Abbott is the former executive director of the Illinois Right to Life Committee and the former director of public affairs for the Chicago-based Pro-Life Action League. He is a Catholic journalist and commentator. He can be reached at mattcabbott@hotmail.com.

© Copyright 2004 by Matt C. Abbott
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/abbott/041226



The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.


1 posted on 01/03/2005 8:54:00 AM PST by St. Johann Tetzel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: St. Johann Tetzel

Or 4, it wasn't really a suicide...


2 posted on 01/03/2005 9:01:52 AM PST by murphE ("I ain't no physicist, but I know what matters." - Popeye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Johann Tetzel; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; ...
Cardinal "Seamless 'vote for democrats' Garment" Bernardin
 
Straight Guy with the Catholic Eye: Priest parades 'seamless garment' while students walk for life
 
"Catholic" John Kerry's 'seamless garment'
 
The Legacy of Cardinal Bernardin’s Common Ground Seamless  Garment, Which is a RAG!!

3 posted on 01/03/2005 11:02:58 AM PST by Coleus (Let us pray for the 125,000 + victims of the tsunami and the 126,000 aborted Children killed daily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Johann Tetzel

There have been a few more outspoken and incautious dissenting bishops in America, such as Rembert Weakland, who finally had to quit his post in disgrace after it turned out that he had used Church funds to payoff a boyfriend who was blackmailing him. Weakland was an idiot, and frequently came out with obviously heretical remarks.

But Bernardin was immensely more subtle and clever. To my mind, he was the single most destructive force in the post-Vatican II Catholic Church in America. His seamless garment argument more or less convinced the bishops that they didn't need to do anything about abortion. He orchestrated and supported various dissenting lay groups in the Church. He also exerted considerable indirect influence on the bad translations that were perpetrated by ICEL, and the liturgical travesties that were widely imposed. His auxiliary bishops went off to be troublemakers in other cities. He was too smart to stage any clown masses himself, but he encouraged that atmosphere.

Whether or not he was also the head of a homosexual pedophile ring in the Church is still unproven, although widely rumored. I find it altogether believable, although it may never be proven for certain. Likewise the Satanism.


4 posted on 01/03/2005 1:21:36 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: murphE

By George, I think you've go it. And Fr. Minkler in Albany was no suicide either.


5 posted on 01/04/2005 10:25:39 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson