Replies

I was simply demonstrating that there is nothing but hot air in your arguments. There is no fluster there.

I don't really care if you come off your position, as I have yet to see anyone indoctrinated with the belief that a nonsensical literalist interpretation will get them into Heaven change.

I doubt if a good biology course would change that either.

But for anyone who is viewing our discussion, I must make it clear that you have no scientific evidence for your position and are using rhetorical devices not logic or science to falsly claim you have won an argument that you do not even understand.

But for anyone who is viewing our discussion, I must make it clear that you have no scientific evidence for your position and are using rhetorical devices not logic or science to falsly claim you have won an argument that you do not even understand.

That's quite an aggressive assertion for someone who hasn't mastered sentence structure.

[Chuckling...] $10 bucks says your that neigborhood kid that always came up with the "forcefield" thing after someone beat you to the draw with their cap-gun.

As for an intelligence that has the capacity to create an universe: Such an intelligence may not be a deity at all. Religious faiths from antiquity have argued that the universe was created by an entity who was less than God. Andrie Linde suggests it might be possible to create one in the lab: stanford.edu

God bless,...by the way.