[shubi]

"I don't see how you can label creationism "nonsense" while the jury's still out, so to speak."

Science works through a peer reviewed stringent system of observation and analysis. There is not one peer reviewed paper for a "creation scientist/ID" con man in scientific literature.

The jury won't even meet on this one. There is no evidence for creationism except misinterpretation of the Bible.

[shubi]

Ping

[JohnnyM]

The Bible has birds created before land animals. Evolution says otherwise.

The Bible has man formed from the dust of the Earth. Evolution says otherwise.

The Bible says the Sun was created on the 4th day, yet plants were created on the 3rd. How can plants live for a long period of time without the Sun.

The Bible has woman being formed from a man, evolution says otherwise.

Do we even want to start with the fall of man, the issue of a soul, the redemption of Jesus Christ, death coming in to the world through Adam.

Evolution is incompatible with the Scriptures.

JM

[onedoug]

Well, until the "creation" of life is understood - which I don't feel will ever be - any thoughtful consideration is potentially interesting.

"Peer review" long argued for a steady state universe where in The Bible it was ever maintained.

And Maimonides argued for the creation of "time" some thousand years before it was accepted "scientifically".

Obeservation, of course, is the modern key. My mind remains open.