Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: shubi
No, but speaking biologically, they might have given some sentences to efforts, beginning with Urey and Miller in 1953, to derive biology from the organic soup they, and others since, have been discharging electric currents into to try and "create" life.

...Which I don't think they ever will, because they would then understand where life "goes" knowing form whence it came.

I take that, and the millions of other "coincidences" in the "evolution" of our universe, as the emanating from the "mind" of God.

Best to you....

19 posted on 01/21/2005 3:37:54 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: onedoug

Biology texts discuss the abiogensis hypothesis, but it is not in the Theory of Evolution.

The only argument creationists have against evolution is putting the origin of life in it, when it is not there. It is a dishonest tactic and points out that there is not much of Jesus in their attitude or science in their Bible misinterpretation.


25 posted on 01/21/2005 5:07:39 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson