Or, they might not have had any better questions. I hope they got to some substantive questions at some point. If the old boy's been deposed several times already they aren't going to shake him with feigned outrage.
If the old boy's been deposed several times already they aren't going to shake him with feigned outrage.
I think they were trying to make sure he wasn't able to use some philosophical excuse for falsehoods.
There is clear proof that what he said in earlier depositions was false- including notes he wrote himself that contradicted his testimony.