To: pascendi
If I were to press you to substantiate this point, you would fail miserably.I think you are capable of supporting a parallel kingdom, if you disapprove of how the one you live in is run. Not true?
263 posted on
12/13/2004 8:08:36 PM PST by
St.Chuck
(Induimini Dominum Iesum Christum)
To: St.Chuck
"I think you are capable of supporting a parallel kingdom, if you disapprove of how the one you live in is run. Not true?" That would be entirely incorrect.
264 posted on
12/13/2004 8:10:28 PM PST by
pascendi
(Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
To: St.Chuck
While will not find me in opposition to Catholic doctrine.
Pertaining to this particular question, the first source which comes to mind is your namesake, the Bull Unam Sanctam, which declares infallibly that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.
265 posted on
12/13/2004 8:14:57 PM PST by
pascendi
(Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
To: St.Chuck; Unam Sanctam
Son of a gun. Sorry, Chuck.
You people switched names on me while I wasn't paying attention.
At any rate, no, I do not and would not support any parallel structure to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.
267 posted on
12/13/2004 8:18:29 PM PST by
pascendi
(Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson