Posted on 12/05/2004 7:36:20 PM PST by diverteach
In a most kind, Christian manner: please show me the clear scriptural proof.
Sorry,
you have burned far too many bridges with me quite repeatedly
for me to feel like it's the least bit of a worthwhile use of my time and energy.
IF you really want such truth, it's available. But you are highly unlikely to be getting it from me.
Even were I to consent, it would be highly to extremely unlikely to be anything close to a mutually fair-minded exchange and I'm no longer willing to bother much about the only type of exchanges you seem open to on such topics.
Haven't said a thing about anyone's salvation being lacking or at threat for disagreeing with me.
PLEASE BE HONEST WHEN YOU COMMENT ABOUT ME AND WHAT I'VE WRITTEN.
I consider dishonest putting words in my fingers that I didn't write to be quite deplorable.
I have quite an interesting life, thank you.
Your typesetting allegation is simply wholesale contrary to facts as even a cursory review of the recent literature would make abundantly clear.
Actually, never has that been the case.
Either your reading is greatly flawed--most likely--or your evaluation . . . habits . . . of such reading--perhaps grossly distorted by your biases . . .
or
your definitions are quite askew from those in normal dictionaries.
Part of me would be inclined to take you at your word that you've read the recent quality literature.
Given your responses, it seem extremely highly unlikely.
They claim they have the 'same' bibles translations.....'the original garbage texts'.....same codes too?
/all bible code junk
Now IMHO you have gone over the edge and are willing to embrace the Moby Dick school of breaking codes.
I say "in my opinion" because maybe you are indeed igorant of how the Bible was composed, and think God wrote it rather than inspired it. And in that case truly don't recognize the difference between the Torah and the rest of the book. In that case you can't be held responsible for your opinion.
HO HO HO HO HO!
Very funny.
Not at all ignorant about how the Bible was scribed and put together.
Actually, evidently a LOT LESS aware about that
than you are issues related to that and the authentic Codes.
Not at all ignorant about how the Bible was scribed and put together.
CORRECTION:
Actually, evidently I'm a lot MORE aware about how The Bible was scribed and put together
than you are about important issues related to that and the authentic Codes.
Given your . . .
implied, self-assumed
paragon orthodoxy, consistency, intellectual acuity . . .
I guess you must
REJECT TOTALLY
that the root words of the geneology in--Genesis--I think it is--
That the root words of the family names taken in order
tells a good summary of the Gospel story.
Evidently you reject that given your brash and rather irresponsible, (imho):
" stand by that all things are plain in scripture, the so-called bible code (which can disappear with different typesetting) is an attempt to lead people astray by claiming that not all is PLAINLY revealed in Scripture."
You are certainly able to throw in the trash or sewer whatever treasures God hid in HIS Word.
You evidently clearly have thrown out Daniel's Scripture about hiding some things until the end.
Now that you have seemingly functionally told God and Daniel that they are full of it . . . do you plan to compete for Daniel's place in eternity and perhaps God's later on?
Your gnosticism accusation is wrong, inaccurate, demeaning, untrue, hideous, off the wall.
I rebuke the whole idea, in Jesus' Name.
I agree with you about the over the edge statement.
I rebuke you and your false teachings, in the name of Christ. Get thee to a seminary and get you're theology straight.
"I guess you must REJECT TOTALLY that the root words of the geneology in--Genesis--I think it is-- That the root words of the family names taken in order tells a good summary of the Gospel story. "
Yep, I reject it, based on my knowledge of Hebrew.
I suppose now you are going to tell me you are a Hebrew linguist as well?
"You are certainly able to throw in the trash or sewer whatever treasures God hid in HIS Word"
I throw no Scripture in to the 'trash' as you put it, I am merely pointing out that God DOES NOT hide things in Scripture. The Daniel reference is usually taken to mean the book of Revelation by conservative scholars. NOT things hidden in the text.
HOGWASH ON BOTH COUNTS.
The Daniel thing you mention is super laughable.
Welllllllllllllll,
IF
you want to reject that beautiful gift from The Lord based on arguing about the meanings of HEBREW ROOT words,
you will certainly be in some very traditional company.
The RELIGIOUS LEADERS OF JESUS DAY seemed to spend a lot of time arguing over such word meanings.
As I recall, Jesus wasn't that impressed with their word splitting exercises nor with their naysaying attitudes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.