Dear Kolokotronis,
You're welcome.
Actually, in my own first post to this thread, I made similar comments against the arguments contained within the posted article.
"That would be about my timeline! :)"
I'm more hopeful than you are. ;-)
"But no reason not to have a cup of good sweet cafe and a piece of baklava together (like I'm doing right now)!"
That sounds good, but I'm not that big on dessert. If we're eating Greek, there is a chicken-lemon soup that I really, really love...
sitetest
This is perfectly in line with the teachings of +Paul. The Orthodox Church, always applied oikonomia even in this instance -- for practical reasons lower clergy (caretakers of churches) who are really bishops' assistants, are allowed to marry prior to taking Holy Orders. Once ordained, should they become widowed, they can not marry as long as they are ordained priests.
Also, deacons can be married in the Church of the East and the West. I wish the Catholic Church would use some flexibility, as it does for priests who came from Protestant ministries who were already married. Such priests are allowed to remain married. Also the Eastern-rite Catholic priests are allowed to be married (I believe the bishops are not, but I am not sure). Flexibility would go a long way. It is not without a precedent, and it may help specific parishes.
You are right, this is not our issue to get involved in. I just wanted to clerify some of the potential misunderstandings, since Orthodoxy was brought up.
Yes, a celibate clergyman is preferable. But then who is without sin?