[GLENNS]

Oh, so now that you've actually decided to check what the source is we should just forget that you jumped to a unjustified belief that matched your cosmology.

The mere fact that you will readily accept any claims prior to justifying those claims is an indication that your cosmological interpretive grid will always override any evidence proffered against it and the result is an overly aggressive behavior towards those who provide said evidence.

[Quix]

HOGWASH.

Your crew demanded an example of any kind of valid sort of thing I was talking about way back when. This one came along. I chose to risk sharing it.

It rings true to me both from the historicity of it's writing to it's modern relevancy as well as it's Biblical congruence.

You can deny those facts and pretend your paradigm on reality is still valid.

It just doesn't wash with me.

But, at least I offered you yet again something valid to allow you to adjust your constructions on reality more congruently with Scriptures and what God's doing in our era.

Your choice to deny all such.