I have not read the bible codes so I know nothing about them. This may be on the kook side...
http://www.hiddencodes.com/antichrist.htm
Will check it out.
If the codes are not 25-30 or so letters long, and/or have some other extremely unique and improbable collection of letters/words/geometry, then it's likely not up to the current criteria of a solid code.
Tired tonight and not quite up to snuff physically. So, maybe much Later,
My view on all those 'codes' are that they are far to short to be more than artifacts of the process. There is a significant likelihood that they could be found in any long Hebrew text.
It is CONCEIVABLE that some of them might be valid but they just did not ring that way to me. There were no contextual or geographical or artistic factors indicating validity--that I noticed in a quick scan.
Sometimes the fact of the software being out amongst those not given to staying up-to-date on the research and statistics . . . ends up being a blight on the whole phenomenon.
These pseud-codes at the link strike me as rather like Drosnin's shallow hogwash.
imho.