Really? Wow.
"Thus Modernism must also incorporate hatred of the pope and of the papacy See Modernist godfather, a British Jesuit, George......?, SJ, who was the founder of the Modernist heresy (the Modernist equivalent of Lefebvre, so to speak) and every bit as excommuncated as are your leaders in SSPX, although SSPX's anti-Catholic ambitions are far less imaginative and far more limited in scope."
My leader, Pope John Paul II, is excommunicated?
"You must be soooooo disappointed by JP II's survival."
Not really. What made you think something goofy like that?
"Whoever comes next will probably crank up the discipline further against your schism."
My schism? Which schism is that? I go to the indult.
"Make your deal with JP II."
What deal?
"It isn't going to get any better for you under his successor. Return to the promises of Christ while time remains."
I just thought I'd draw you onto the carpet long enough to let you blow some steam and make it clear that you don't really know what you're talking about.
Thank you for your participation.
Unless and until that point, bear in mind that attendance at an Indult Mass will satisfy one requirement of being a Catholic although no more than will attendance at a Novus Ordo Mass. Such attendance, however, no more makes one a Catholic if he adheres to the Marcellian schism than attendance at an SSPX schismatic Mass necessarily makes one an adherent of the SSPX aned therefore in schism.
When you take up the defense of the schism and its excommunicated leaders, you reject JP II as your leader and Catholicism as your Faith in favor of the the pottage of the schism and its leaders.
You too are converting no one adequately catechized. Recruit the cranks and take out the trash.