Well, you make a good case that your preference is for a woman with whom you can discuss issues. Nothing wrong with that, but it is not the criterion for priesthood, as you might well be aware. Your post, however, neatly avoids any theological or ecclesiological reasoning, opting rather for a statement of personal comfort level.
Having a woman priest is simply wrongful as a matter of doctrine. The reasons are manifold and the only way one can evade them is to ignore them. Do so, if you wish, but then content yourself to be forever separated from any diocese I could be expected to doctrinally support and swear allegiance to. And remain aware that it was the insistence that women could be priests which originally cleaved the Church of England and her daughters from each other and from the wider Catholic communion. Twas this which caused the breach, not homosexuals and certainly not those who simply continued the doctrine their fathers bequeathed them. To endorse female priests is to break faith and it has led to so much additional pain and breakage one pauses to continue.
It does bear repeating, however.
Thanks.
That's apparently a widely held point of view, but it is not mine. But thanks for caring.