Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: armydoc
Once again, the good thief was not baptised because Christ did not institute baptism as a requirement until after He was crucified. Until He instituted it, how could it have been a requirement.

As far as a literal interpretation goes, Trent (among other councils) has already declared its interpretation as being literal. CANON II.-If any one saith, that true and natural water is not of necessity for baptism, and, on that account, wrests, to some sort of metaphor, those words of our Lord Jesus Christ; Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost; let him be anathema.

34 posted on 10/11/2004 8:29:04 AM PDT by Stubborn (It Is The Mass That Matters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Stubborn

What about the baptism of desire? Or the "baptism by fire" of a battlefield conversion shortly before death and before the a baptism could be preformed?


35 posted on 10/11/2004 8:49:37 AM PDT by redgolum (Molon labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Stubborn; armydoc
"Once again, the good thief was not baptised because Christ did not institute baptism as a requirement until after He was crucified. Until He instituted it, how could it have been a requirement."

On the contrary, people were thronging to John's Baptism, including Jesus the Christ Himself. It was the in thing to do in those days.

What is the more likely assumption to make is that the process was not complete for mankind until the Lamb of God made His Sacrifice.

Since John's Baptism was such a phenomenom in those days, why would we speculate that Dismas was also not Baptized? Because he was a thief? I say we have Baptized theives among us even today.

42 posted on 10/11/2004 10:25:49 AM PDT by Arguss (Take the narrow road)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Stubborn; armydoc
"Once again, the good thief was not baptised because Christ did not institute baptism as a requirement until after He was crucified. Until He instituted it, how could it have been a requirement."

On the contrary, people were thronging to John's Baptism, including Jesus the Christ Himself. It was the in thing to do in those days.

What is the more likely assumption to make is that the process was not complete for mankind until the Lamb of God made His Sacrifice.

Since John's Baptism was such a phenomenom in those days, why would we speculate that Dismas was also not Baptized? Because he was a thief? I say we have Baptized theives among us even today.

43 posted on 10/11/2004 10:27:29 AM PDT by Arguss (Take the narrow road)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson