Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Shryke
Yes, that is the standard Catholic position. I would however like to know what reason is there to ignore the natural reading of brother = literal brother.
29 posted on 09/21/2004 9:30:06 AM PDT by UsnDadof8 (Proud Virginian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: UsnDadof8

"I would however like to know what reason is there to ignore the natural reading of brother = literal brother."

Because until very recently, all Christians believed that Mary was perpetually virgin. Therefore the Scripture was interpreted in the light of this common, ancient belief and thus "brother" was never understood in its literal physical sense.

Luther, Calvin and Zwingli all believed and defended her perpetual virginity, and this doctrine was never part of the original Catholic vs. Protestant controversy. It was something that all were agreed on.

That it has become an issue in more recent times is probably due to the way the English language has developed over the last few hundred years. Words change their force, meaning, and latitude of interpretation over time. e.g. what do the words "gay" and "wicked" mean in colloquial speech now compared to 100 years ago?


44 posted on 09/21/2004 10:20:30 AM PDT by Tantumergo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson