[lupie]

I canNOT say the same for his son or his disciples. I think probably Kenneth Copeland is the most balanced of those I've paid much attention to.

I have found Copeland to be way out there and rather spooky to watch.

[repub32]

UH UH Kenneth Copeland, ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh he is scary!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Quix]

I think he's matured and learned from his excesses.

I don't think he's that far off on basic theology stuff.

Some of his speculations can be a bit much. Maybe he says too much about those.

I think the biggest part of Copeland and maybe some of the others is

mostly

just a somewhat localized Texan/Oklahoma/Southern affectation and set of mannerisms and subcultural mores, customs, styles.

I don't consider most of that stuff much of anything at all.

I believe Copeland has blessed a lot of people with the relatively pure Word of God in MOST of his sermons.

I haven't appreciated his or certainly any of the other's excesses and abberations.

But I think people who are quick to judge are often very blind to similar junk in their own theology, customs, etc. But because such are THEIRS and DIFFERENT from COPELANDS!!! then, THEIR fringe junk is somehow more righteous. I think that mentality stinks TONS.