Hi Quix,
I have to admit that I don't know that much about Hagin's stuff. What I do know, I have not been impressed, but that is from people spouting his stuff and not from me spending much time in it. Is it Hagin that this person is spouting? I thought at least some of it was Bullinger. Some of Bullinger's stuff I like, but I am fairly sure he believes in the gap theory. I don't. But his book on Numbers in Scripture is well done.
you said: "Is it Hagin that this person is spouting?"
are you talkng about me?????
Am not familiar with Bullinger.
I have listened to 100's of hours worth of Hagin tapes.
It was very, very difficult to impossible to find any Scriptural fault with what he said. He was very scrupulous about how he put things. And sometimes, he seemed to come right up to a line I was beginning to feel wary about but he'd stop short of crossing over the Scriptural balance I perceived in Scripture. I don't say I agreed with everything he said. But overwhelmingly, I found him Scriptural.
I canNOT say the same for his son or his disciples. I think probably Kenneth Copeland is the most balanced of those I've paid much attention to.
Also, I think his son and disciples are not the most humble people I'd hope to meet. That's probably a source of great . . . trouble.
Anyway--just my 2 cents worth.