Replies

"Medjugorje is not an approved apparition! It is an occasion to sucker gullible souls to make pilgrimages and spend money on trinkets that have no meaning."

Holy smoke, we agree on something.

I guess I join the shock and awe campaign. I agree with the general comments on Medjugorje. Unfortunately, it is like the Bayside folks, (or SSPXers) they take it personally when you point out the fly in the ointment.

In the SE we have the Conyers problem as well.

98 posted on 08/29/2004 11:20:57 AM PDT by Dominick ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)

"I guess I join the shock and awe campaign. I agree with the general comments on Medjugorje. Unfortunately, it is like the Bayside folks, (or SSPXers) they take it personally when you point out the fly in the ointment."

Leave it to you to somehow make a connection between two condemned apparitions and... the SSPX?

The false apparition at Medjugorje is a fly in the charistmatic, new order Catholic's ointment and it's a big one. The false cackling seer in New York? Well, that's back-East for you.

Connecting these things with the Latin Mass... what's up with that?

126 posted on 08/29/2004 12:31:12 PM PDT by pascendi (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)