Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur

Theres probably not many scientists who are saints.


39 posted on 08/29/2004 8:34:40 AM PDT by Stubborn (It is the Mass that matters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Stubborn; Dr. Eckleburg
Stubborn wrote:
Theres (sic) probably not many scientists who are saints.
You would be surprised at the number of us who are believers in Christ. Many recognize, along with D. James Kennedy, that evolution is a fairy tale for adults. It simply isn't "science" because it is not an "observable" that can be tested in the laboratory. Many of us are offended by the number of known falsehoods that are presented in modern texts, simply so that proponents can maintain their anti-supernatural bias. It takes more "blind faith" to be an evolutionist who believes that the "highly improbable" happened than it does to take God at His Word and believe in the pre-existent One who created the earth and later was incarnated and died to save all who believe in Him.

Darwin's whole theory hinges on the idea of a simple one/few cell organism that evolved. The biochemists who work on RNA and DNA realize the complexity of these molecules and understand that there is simply insufficient time for such a molecule to develop by "chance." I just spent a week with a creationist who has a Ph.D. in Biochemistry and prefers to let God speak for Himself in the Scriptures. As One with a Ph. D. in Polymer Science and Engineering, I am not embarrassed to join my Biochemist friends in calling Jesus Christ 'Lord.'

138 posted on 08/29/2004 1:58:34 PM PDT by RochesterFan (Proud to be a FR Calvinist - but wary: we're on the endangered species list...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson