Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Is it any wonder that Darwin, the apostle of evolutionary thinking, in his book Origin of the Species wrote the following: "To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have formed by natural selection, seems I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree."

It's so nice to see that quote-mining -- stripping this particular quote from Darwin out of context to completely lie about his intended statement -- is still alive and well.
151 posted on 08/29/2004 3:51:28 PM PDT by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio; RochesterFan

If it's good enough for the Fabian Darwin, it's good enough for me.


153 posted on 08/29/2004 4:06:22 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (Hey, RNC! Get Bob Dylan to sing "Saving Grace" at the Convention!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
It's so nice to see that quote-mining -- stripping this particular quote from Darwin out of context to completely lie about his intended statement -- is still alive and well.

Here is the whole statement, for any interested.

To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree. Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. (The Origin of Species, ch. 6)

154 posted on 08/29/2004 4:07:10 PM PDT by gbcdoj ("Adam himself and his wife, who were not born of other parents, but were created" - Pope Pelagius I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
"To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have formed by natural selection, seems I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree."

The quote is in context, just as stated, that the premise proposed is absurd.

186 posted on 08/30/2004 7:52:30 AM PDT by stop_killing_unborn_babies (Abortion is America's Holocaust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson