Hey .... it may not be worthy enough to wrap fish but, as a "NYer", I would challenge the words "most worthless". The NYT could win that category. Here is how the RFT describe themselves.
The Riverfront Times was founded in 1977 as St. Louis's alternative newsweekly. Since then, we've cultivated an audited weekly circulation of 100,000. Because of the pass-along nature of the RFT, our weekly reach is more than a quarter of a million readers.
The Riverfront Times focuses on the issues that are important to St. Louis's young adults. Each week, hundreds of thousands of readers turn to the RFT for award-winning journalism, powerful investigative reporting, news and commentary on local politics, and the most comprehensive arts and entertainment coverage in the St. Louis area.
If this article represents their best attempt to dig up dirt on the good archbishop, it's no wonder their circulation is so poor. As to the "names" posted in this 'flagship edition of moral depravity', how seriously can one take them? Written BY MALCOLM GAY, with a testimonial from Richard Dickman?!
Puhlease!!! Garbage like this doesn't even deserve 1k of commentary from any of us. This thread should have ended with Girlshortstop's rebuttal in post #2.