At the very minimum, you presume the innocence of the Bishop until otherwise is shown, and I happen to agree with that predicate, even though I think that Bishop is a scumbucket--and he's merely meeting his mirror-image in the lawyer.
To repeat: do you know with MORAL CERTAINTY that the claims made in this article about the nun are true?
Mary Therese Helmueller is quoted as having objected about the transgendered nun to the Papal Nuncio.
That would be the same Mary Therese Helmueller who asked Burke to be spiritual director on a pilgrimage to the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico city, documented here.
The real question here isn't whether or not the source of the story has an axe to grind, its pretty obvious they do, Burke certainly didn't want this story to come out.
But the question is whether or not the RCC is currently consecrating transexuals as nuns. Its either true or it ain't, and if its true it shows a huge amount of moral corruption on part of the hierarchy including Burke.
Regardless of the viewpoint of the Riverside site .
This kind of thing needs brought forward if true.