To: GirlShortstop
Actually it's not a smear. It was explained in the article.
Burke, apparently, invited some fringe religious orders, with one or two people, to come to LaCrosse because they were "traditional."
Some in those orders were not exactly psychologically healthy individuals.
4 posted on
08/26/2004 4:20:24 PM PDT by
sinkspur
("What's the point in being Pope if I can't wear the tiara?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
To: sinkspur
"Burke, apparently, invited some fringe religious orders, with one or two people, to come to LaCrosse because they were "traditional." "
Let's clarify that: "traditional" = conservative Novus Ordo. How many "traditionalists" on FR or otherwise would attend a NO "Mass" by their bishop?
5 posted on
08/26/2004 4:45:48 PM PDT by
corpus
To: sinkspur; Desdemona
Burke, apparently, invited some fringe religious orders, with one or two people, to come to LaCrosse because they were "traditional."
Some in those orders were not exactly psychologically healthy individuals.In February 2002, the order's superior, Monsignor Timothy Svea, pleaded guilty to exposing himself to and molesting teenage boys.
Perhaps I'm still hung up on "That's why...", :-) but it is illogical to tie Archbishop Burke's invitation to priests to celebrate the Tridentine rite to the pervert's actions. Doesn't the invitation mentioned indicate they were outside his diocese? Surely you recognize that when priests fall, they fall hard; in this case what looks like spreading blame [for perversion] is assinine. I'm missing something, and remain skeptical as to what this article's purpose is. Pax et bonum.
7 posted on
08/26/2004 4:50:14 PM PDT by
GirlShortstop
(« O sublime humility! That the Lord... should humble Himself like this... »)
To: sinkspur
IT's the RIverfront TImes which is less objective than the Post-Dispatch and not in a good way. The whole purpose here is for them to divide and conquer.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson