Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
I don't care to speculate, but I can think of at least one or two circumstances that could have given rise to this story, but nonetheless wouldn't support the view that this is a "transgendered" person.

Well, I can't. How does Joel Green become Julie Green without a nip here and a tuck there?

This is really that important, sitetest, and we've spent far too much time on it already.

I'm not as big a fan of Burke as everybody else is around here, but that's probably obvious. I'm not wild about $25 million shrines, or Cathedral refurbishments, or $200 million Cathedrals. They are extravagances that are usually monuments to the bishops who build them.

101 posted on 08/27/2004 8:00:54 AM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if I can't wear the tiara?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest
This is really not that important.
102 posted on 08/27/2004 8:02:23 AM PDT by sinkspur ("What's the point in being Pope if I can't wear the tiara?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

Dear sinkspur,

Well, your imagination isn't as active as mine. ;-)

I would merely state that there are several chromosomal disorders that leave their sufferers in a state of less-than-fully-determined sex. Correcting those disorders, as best one can, is radically different from "transgendering" a man who is clearly a man into a "woman" or vice versa.

I don't really have a problem with $25 million shrines, or $200 million cathedrals. I have a problem with $200 million wasted on architectural monstrosities that make one naturally recoil in horror rather than wish to give praise and glory to God.

I know that the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception here in Washington cost a great deal of money, in 2004 dollars. Not for a moment do I considered that money to have been poorly-spent.

I'm sure that in its day, the Temple in Jerusalem cost a pretty penney, but I don't recall our Lord remonstrating against the cost of the project; rather, He called it His Father's House.

I think that generally, the distaste for expensive ecclesial building projects betrays a somewhat limited view of the right use of material wealth.

But heck, I drive a Benz, so you know on which side of the argument I'll be found. ;-)


sitetest


103 posted on 08/27/2004 8:09:03 AM PDT by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson