To: GirlShortstop
Maybe.
But I doubt it.
It IS interesting that this Pope kinda thinks Catholics ought to be in union with the Pope.
Do you suppose that the SSPX is aware of Pius VI?
4 posted on
08/03/2004 7:59:03 AM PDT by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: ninenot
It IS interesting that this Pope kinda thinks Catholics ought to be in union with the Pope.
Ain't that somethin'?! ;-) Pax et bonum.
5 posted on
08/03/2004 8:02:23 AM PDT by
GirlShortstop
(« O sublime humility! That the Lord... should humble Himself like this... »)
To: ninenot
Do you suppose that the SSPX is aware of Pius VI?
I think they claim he is a nullity...
6 posted on
08/03/2004 8:03:18 AM PDT by
Dominick
("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
To: ninenot; All
I would expect the neo-Catholics on this site to ignore the heart of the article and seize on the final citation, which is a non-sequitur, considering the rest. But let me ask you--what if the Pope is at the head of the revolution? What if he is the one appointing the revolutionary bishops and archbishops and cardinals? What if he's the one leading the charge? What then?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson