Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
The term "Co-Redemptrix" ain't gonna cut it. It implies a co-equal status with Christ, and the attempted explanation of such a term to mean what it doesn't clearly mean would be a nightmare.

"Mediatrix" is much more understandable, and is easily related to our own role in bringing Christ to other men. We have that concept clearly defined already.

So, why not leave it at that?

6 posted on 07/24/2004 9:08:01 PM PDT by sinkspur (There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
and the attempted explanation of such a term to mean what it doesn't clearly mean would be a nightmare.

I thought the explanation was pretty clear, co/cum means "with" not on an equal footing but in a subordinate fashion as Paul says:

(Col 1:24): "Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ's afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church,"

Mary's sufferings are efficacious towards the redemption of man because they are wholly rooted in the redemptive graces of Christ and are perfectly united to His redeeming will. Similarly, as Mediatrix, the Mother of Jesus does not "rival" Christ's mediation but rather participates in the one mediation of Jesus Christ. Imagine water from a reservoir reaching the people through a system of aqueducts or channels. By analogy, Jesus is the infinite "reservoir" of all grace, which is distributed to us through Mary .... as she gave birth to Jesus. Jesus, the one mediator, does not exclude secondary, subordinate mediators.

This is pretty clear, I think its easier to explain than the Assumption, but that's just me.

7 posted on 07/25/2004 4:30:24 AM PDT by Diva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

By the will of the Holy Ghost, I am in acreement with you here.


8 posted on 07/25/2004 5:00:45 AM PDT by Robert Drobot (God, family, country. All else is meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

Yeah. I'm skeptical that the precise definition of "co-" will EVER sink in, even though the theology is clear.

We suffer from a lack of precision in definition...


14 posted on 07/25/2004 7:08:09 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson