Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: pascendi

I agree with gbcdoj. There. No need to referee. The cardinal said something that I do not believe needs to be emphasized.

However, you and Irish guy make it out like it is another Assisi or something and it is not. You remind me of the Pharisees who were scandalized because Jesus Christ ate with public sinners. Did Christ hammer them right away and condemn them? In most, incidents, he gradually led them along. Perhaps there is a basis in our approach in his example? Or is the Sacred Scripture not "traditional" enough for you?


77 posted on 07/21/2004 5:38:21 AM PDT by Mershon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Mershon; pascendi
In most, incidents, he gradually led them along.

When did Christ ever say "it is important that each person remain loyal to his or her own faith"?

That's leading them along?

79 posted on 07/21/2004 5:43:03 AM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Mershon; gbcdoj
"The cardinal said something that I do not believe needs to be emphasized."

Oh, but it most certainly does. It contradicts the doctrine of the Catholic Church.

But as to the fact that you don't believe it needs to be emphasized, that makes sense. If I were on your side of the fence, I wouldn't want to see it emphasized either.
86 posted on 07/21/2004 7:44:51 AM PDT by pascendi (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson