I am not changing the topic. Nevertheless, I do think the header is misleading. I don't fault you and do not think it was deliberate.
Why insert (former) in the altered title? That is NOT the title the author used. The link says:
PRIEST AND DOZENS OF OTHERS WITNESSED UNUSUAL IMAGES IN BLESSED SACRAMENT
Because the "DOZENS" of "OTHER WITNESSES" included (FORMER) BAPTISTS.