Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur; Dominick
No EEM should take it upon himself or herself to refuse the Eucharist to anybody.

Why not? Bishop Hubbard has already extended the *Welcome* sign to John Kerry, with full assurance that he would not be denied communion here.

Were I an EEM and John Kerry presented himself to me, I would deny him. What is the bishop going to do - excommunicate me?

46 posted on 07/03/2004 1:58:52 PM PDT by NYer ("Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by doing that some have entertained angels.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: NYer
Were I an EEM and John Kerry presented himself to me, I would deny him. What is the bishop going to do - excommunicate me?

No, but don't be surprised if you're asked to step down.

You simply are not empowered to make these decisions, as an EEM. If you could not follow this prescription, then you have no business being an EEM.

47 posted on 07/03/2004 2:01:30 PM PDT by sinkspur (There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: NYer; sinkspur
Were I an EEM and John Kerry presented himself to me, I would deny him. What is the bishop going to do - excommunicate me? >

Amen!

Ratzinger:

5. Regarding the grave sin of abortion or euthanasia, when a person’s formal cooperation becomes manifest (understood, in the case of a Catholic politician, as his consistently campaigning and voting for permissive abortion and euthanasia laws), his Pastor should meet with him, instructing him about the Church’s teaching, informing him that he is not to present himself for Holy Communion until he brings to an end the objective situation of sin, and warning him that he will otherwise be denied the Eucharist.

6. When “these precautionary measures have not had their effect or in which they were not possible,” and the person in question, with obstinate persistence, still presents himself to receive the Holy Eucharist, “the minister of Holy Communion must refuse to distribute it”

Notice that Ratzinger simply states, “the minister of Holy Communion must refuse to distribute it” . He makes NO distinction between bishop, priest, deacon or EEM.

Therefore, regardless of the cowardice or cooperation with evil of the USCCB or the local bishop, all ministers of Holy Communion MUST refuse to distribute it. That would include EEMs the way I read Ratzinger's statement here.

49 posted on 07/03/2004 2:14:19 PM PDT by Polycarp IV (PRO-LIFE orthodox Catholic - -without exception, without compromise, without apology. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson