Christ whom we adore is really present
Jesus is no longer present to men in the same way that he was on the roads of Palestine. After the Resurrection, he appeared in his glorious body to the women and to his disciples. Then he took the Apostles and "led them out as far as Bethany, and lifting up his hands he blessed them. ...He parted from them, and was carried up into heaven" (Lk 24:50-51). But in ascending to the Father, Christ did not distance himself from men. He dwells forever in the midst of his brethren and, just as he promised, he accompanies them and guides them with his Spirit. Henceforth, his presence is of another kind. Indeed, "at the Last Supper, after celebrating the Passover with his disciples and when he was about to pass from this world to his Father, Christ instituted this sacrament as the perpetual memorial of his Passion..., the greatest of all his miracles; and he left this sacrament to those whom his absence filled with grief, as an incomparable consolation" St. Thomas Aquinas, Office of Corpus Christi, 57, 4). Every time we celebrate the Eucharist in the Church, we recall the death of the Saviour, we proclaim his Resurrection as we await his return. Thus no sacrament is greater or more precious than that of the Eucharist; and when we receive Communion, we are incorporated into Christ. Our life is transformed and taken up by the Lord.
You may think I am calling the Pope a liar. But I am simply stating the facts. They speak for themselves. He says one thing, then does another. What are we to think? His outdoor papal Masses have caused grave scandal--and have been written about in the secular press. Sacred Hosts are passed around like potato chips, falling into the ground, getting trampled underfoot. Even worse things happen. Yet he lectures the world on liturgical abuses. He writes to the bishops that prohibiting kneeling for Communion would contribute to a diminution of faith in the dogma on the Real Presence--then signs onto it anyway. How does this protect the treasury of faith--which is his primary job, after all.
I just cite the facts--make of them what you will.
By the way, in this matter of justice, it is not just for a pope to let liberal bishops deny the truths of the Gospels, deny the decrees of the Council of Trent, affirm Martin Luther while denying the teachings of preconciliar popes--then turn around and pounce on a single traditional bishop for defending Catholic Tradition. That is injustice of an obvious sort. What is most galling is it is done by deceit. Neither popes nor cardinals will admit the truth--that it is Traditional Catholicism which they oppose.