Technically, what you propose is an impossibility--that is, that NO rubrics would be used in an Old Rite Mass. No can do, mon...
Further, the translation is SO bad, especially in the case of the Orations, that elementary Latin students can pick up the differences, if both the Latin and the English are side-by-side. In fact, you can pick it up from Spanish/English fascicles that are out today.
In some ways, the slovenliness is societally endemic, not limited to the Church. OTOH, many priests have not made it a point to be particular about their mannerisms.
The 65 missal, as you can see here
http://www.coreyzelinski.8m.com/1965_Mass/
Was almost identical to the 62 missal, same offertory, same canon and so on, and by the time 67 came around, the rubrics came to resmble the NO was see today, minue the women on the altar. By 67, it was all inthe vernacular, with the priest facing the people and people standing for communion in probably a majority of the parishes in the US with lay readers for the Epistle. By 69, the 65 missal was allowed to be used with multiple Canons.
Yes, the translation as we all agree was poor, and translated by people with an agenda, but that said, imagine if the 62 missal was translated by the ICEL?