It seems my comments were a bit too close to the bone - even though I'm by no means the first to identify a link between liturgical abuse (including opposition to the traditional Latin Mass) and disordered sexuality.
Roman Catholic Faithful has been exposing this link for years. Before you throw another wild tantrum, perhaps you should taste some of your own medicine:
"Grow up, if you can’t debate without childish ad hominems like that, you have no place on an adult forum."
They weren't the first.
E Michael Jones, in the old Fidelity (now Culture Wars) made the connection about 15-20 years ago.
Although it's a VERY interesting thesis, it's not tautological, and it could very easily be expanded to include the Clinton betrayals--of wife AND country as a similar, hetero, theory.
It's my experience that the theory is quite good.
Only refinement I would add is that contrite and repentant queers (and heteros) are generally not prone to the syndrome described by Jones, et al.
It seems my comments were a bit too close to the bone - even though I'm by no means the first to identify a link between liturgical abuse (including opposition to the traditional Latin Mass) and disordered sexuality.Two things. First, that isn’t what I called you on. I called you on your pathetic attempt to tar and feather posters here with that same brush. Second, the mere fact that some other type has done it before hardly makes it right.
patent