Homosexual Agenda Ping - Can someone explain this in simple layman's language?
To my untutored eyes, it looks kind of neither here nor there.
The 1961 statement looks fine, although obviously the lavender mafia wasn't paying attention:
"Those affected by the perverse inclination to homosexuality or pederasty should be excluded from religious vows and ordination."
But I don't like this comment:
One Latin American cardinal said at the time, "It's clear to me that a man's bio-genetic makeup shouldn't be our interest so much as his behavior."
So the Latin American cardinal is buying homosexual rights lie that homosexuality is genetic. And that such "born that way" homosexuals make fine priests.
Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.
(I'll be gone all weekend, if anyone sees relevant articles you can alert EdReform or Scripter!)