Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: FactQuest
I'm trying to figure out how an infallible Pope can apologize for something a previous Pope did, and still claim that Popes are infallible.

You are very confused.

"Infallible" means "capable of teaching without error," not "incapable of sin or wrongdoing." The Pope goes to confession weekly; he is a sinner, as we all are, and admits it.

The 4th Crusade's attack on Constantinople was not "something [the] Pope did". It was something Catholics did, however. It's a historical fact that the Pope at the time condemned the acts of the Crusaders in sacking Constantinople.

8 posted on 04/30/2004 7:55:24 AM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Campion
That is a significant difference from the "normal" meaning of the word. I could, by the same rules, say that I am "perfect," as long as I explain that by "perfect" I mean that in my heart I try to be perfect.

That aside, working with the novel definition, what about Vatican II?
9 posted on 04/30/2004 7:59:46 AM PDT by FactQuest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Campion
That's right. Innocent III excommunicated the Crusaders who sacked Constantinople because they disobeyed his orders to attack the Holy Land.
67 posted on 05/01/2004 12:39:38 AM PDT by Revenge of Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson