[Auntie Dem]

I challenge you to provide your evidence.

And just what "evidence" would convince you?

As I have previously stated I do not think anything I provide will convince you sign-seekers. But, let's try a little test, I will provide what I think is adequate proof, and if there are open-minded individuals reading the thread we can take a vote as to who thinks the evidence is 1, Proof positive; 2, Convincing, but not absolute; 3, Worth further investigation; or 4, Not convinced, but would like to see more, and lastly, the one I predict you sanctimonious ones will choose, 5, Not convinced, I will burn in hell before I accept it.

[snerkel]

And just what "evidence" would convince you?

Factual evidence from a non-biased source would suffice.

As I have previously stated I do not think anything I provide will convince you sign-seekers. But, let's try a little test, I will provide what I think is adequate proof, and if there are open-minded individuals reading the thread we can take a vote as to who thinks the evidence is 1, Proof positive; 2, Convincing, but not absolute; 3, Worth further investigation; or 4, Not convinced, but would like to see more, and lastly, the one I predict you sanctimonious ones will choose, 5, Not convinced, I will burn in hell before I accept it.

Blah, blah, blah. Where's the beef?