Of course. Aretakis is a smear-artist. He's had THREE lawsuits thrown out, having brought all THREE of them outside the statute of limitations.
Hubbard could not have picked better opponents.
Same ole sinky, disingenuous as usual, harping on the same ole partial truth in an attempt to fool the gullible. Fortunately, most of us here are quite used to your AmChurch Propaganda Alinsky type of shameless lies.
Once again sinky, you have been corrected before that those lawsuits were NOT dismissed for lack of merit, but only due to coverup and procedural manipulation by Hubbard, which still points to his factual involvement in that mess. Even Hubbard himself admitted he had been "less than transparent" in dealing with these cases so why do you skew the facts that not even Hubbard would deny? Yeah yeah, save your breath, we know the answer only too well.
Precisely, Cincinnatus posted the below to you not even a month ago which left you speechless.
Fr. Doyle is being a bit disingenuous here. As I understand it, all of the cases that were thrown out were on statute of limitations grounds, NOT because they factually lacked merit. What Aretakis was unable to prove was that the diocesan coverup was such as would toll the statute of limitations and allow the cases to go forward. BIG difference and Atty. Fr. Doyle knows that. His continued smearing of Atty Aretakis is bad lawyering, unethical, and almost certainly sinful.
You also conveniently ignored to highlight the fact that Minkler's "henry letter" was under investigation by RCF way before Aretakis ever came on the scene, and RCF has an excellent track record of exposing and help getting rid of (some) corrupt AmChurch bishops like Ryan and Weakland.
I am a patient man. there is much more to be revealed in good time, and there will be a Grand Finale where Hubbard is properly disgraced (as he should be) and leave the scene for good. You just sit tight.