To: shroudie
Thank you for getting the information out, shroudie.
It's interesting how science has not been able to disprove the claim. The historical facts of the shroud are of more interest, I believe, than the scientific ones. It's existence is documented much farther back than the 13th century. I wish there was more information from Constantinople before the shroud was brought to Europe during the crusades.
37 posted on
04/14/2004 6:18:24 AM PDT by
Desdemona
(Proverbs 18:2 A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.)
To: Desdemona
I wish there was more information from Constantinople before the shroud was brought to Europe during the crusades. Yeah, what we're lacking here is a "chain of custody." :-) Especially before the 13th century.
It's impossible, by the way, to prove a negative. It's also necessary here to disprove documents which coincide with the beginning of the existing chain of custody and declare inauthenticity. But lots of creative minds are hard at work!
This issue will never be resolved to everybody's satisfaction, no matter what. Too much emotion tied up in it at this point.
41 posted on
04/14/2004 6:41:13 AM PDT by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of Venery (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson