[EternalHope]

What I find funny is that any scientist who looks at the evidence and says, "Nah, it's a fake," will be hysterically described as being in hysterical denial.

To say it's a fake without any idea of HOW it could be faked is simply denial. Thus far, no one has any idea how the image could have been faked.

[orionblamblam]

> To say it's a fake without any idea of HOW it could be faked is simply denial.

Incorrect. Here's the logic:

Theory: This is the Actual Shroud OF Jesus.
Refutation: Carbon dating puts it at less than a thousand years old. Theory conclusively refuted.

Theory refuted; it's a fake. Exactly how the image got there is another matter; but the evidence shows it to *not* be the shroud of Jesus