Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RaceBannon

It may be a genuine burial cloth, but there is no way it was Jesus' burial cloth.

2 posted on 04/10/2004 11:13:04 AM PDT by RaceBannon (VOTE DEMOCRAT AND LEARN ARABIC FREE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RaceBannon; polemikos
Do an exoeriment I saw on the Discovery channel. Take your face or even a doll's face and rub it with some sort of cream like Nivea, then take cloth and cover the face - and then remove to see the image.

What you get is stretched out rubber like oval face rather than a photographic depiction.

8 posted on 04/10/2004 12:43:54 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon
My faith doesn't depend on whether the Shroud is true or not. But with all this attention on the Shroud, God help us if the Ark of Covenent is ever found.:)
16 posted on 04/10/2004 6:08:44 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon
It may be a genuine burial cloth, but there is no way it was Jesus' burial cloth.

There is no way for you to make this statement authoritavely unless God revealed this specifically to you. Even the scientists are claiming an honest agnosticism.

As for it being an idol, you would probably have a problem with the woman who was healed by touching the tassle on Jesus' cloak or the men who were hoping to be healed by the shadows of the apostles as they passed by them.

38 posted on 04/12/2004 9:01:22 AM PDT by TradicalRC (Fides quaerens intellectum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson