Reviving a thread? I guess I'll now bttt it everyday just to make you happy.
You ask, "what do you mean bogus? you're the only [C]atholic who thinks so."
The article's clueless author, blindly accepted her single-source sodomite-friendly list, without checking it out! Her source wrongly listed a church the source named "Christ the King, Our Lady of the Sacred Heart -- Santa Clara" .
Dangus attempted to cover for this lie suggesting,
No church or parish by any of these names has EVER existed in Santa Clara.
Further, ArrogantBustard's Post #55 also casts a questionable light on the veracity of the 'list' promoted by the article's author.
You need to revise the number of Roman Rite Catholics who question the accuracy of the list by 100%. There are at least two of us now; perhaps because we are the only two who made the effort validate it.
You might also like to speak with your Confessor about the sinfulness of promoting a lie ( this article ), by attempting to give standing to sinners.
You have not addressed my question about your motivation for dredging up this article for FReeper re-consideration. One year to respond to a post. It's got to be a FReeper record.